Remember the second Minecraft comp that we started back in October? Because I don't.
User Comments (5) | Quirvy |
 Â
Karma: 655 Posts: 7753 Gender: Male pm | email
|
This took so long because of a very heated debate that lasted 4 months, over whether or not the Interslide was deserving of first or second place. In the end it was agreed that it would be placed second.
spooky secret | | Yaya |
Age: 29 Karma: 747 Posts: 5367 Location: Ohio (US) pm | email
|
The judging in this comp was made quickly, in a rushed manner, and therefore was very bad. The idea I'm suggesting here is to make a rejudge of this comp. Judge and rate it - slowly, seriously, taking your time. Even if the lose their medals or stuff - rushing with the judging can really hurt our community.
COMING SOON: A giant meteor. Please.
Give me +karma. Give me +karma. | | jazz |
Karma: 108 Posts: 3050 pm | email
|
Quirvy is lying. There was a 2 week debate, then everyone became busy. We finalized the results a few weeks ago, and now Livio's publishing it.
EDIT: Oops! This was my 2038th post and I forgot to make a note! Where's the computers resetting back to 19something? | | Livio |
Age: 31 Karma: 470 Posts: 9620 Gender: Male Location: Arizona, USA pm | email
|
It took us four months to judge one level. That's got to be a new record in comp-judging efficiency. | | Quirvy |
 Â
Karma: 655 Posts: 7753 Gender: Male pm | email
|
Jazz is lying. It wasn't even a 2 week debate. There were only 7 days where someone said anything, and those 7 days were spread out over 4 months. And the "a few weeks ago" when we finalized the results was actually yesterday.
'Livio' said: It took us four months to judge one level. That's got to be a new record in comp-judging efficiency. The DDA comp had no entries, so regardless of how much time it took, its judging was less efficient than this one's.
spooky secret | | |
« Forum Index < The Minecraft BoardIn order to post in the forums, you must be logged into your account. Click here to login.
|